Showing posts with label Gill-Man. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Gill-Man. Show all posts

Monday, July 2, 2012

From The Archives: The Creature Walks Among Us: A Look At An Overlooked Masterpiece

It’s time to talk about …


This is the third installment in the Gill-Man’s saga, and even though it was the last of the trilogy it did manage to claim a few firsts (though not necessarily good ones).

For instance, this was the first of the series not to be shot in 3-D, it was the first not directed by Jack Arnold, and it was the first to feature a Gill-Man who … really wasn’t a gill man at all.

The directing duties were passed to John Sherwood who was a highly prolific assistant director, having worked in that capacity on films like Bend In the River, The Glenn Miller Story, and Francis (the talking mule) Joins The WACS. The Creature Walks Among Us was only the second of a total of three films he would ever make as a full on director.

On the plus side, William Alland is once again producing, Ricou Browning is back to perform the Gill-Man’s swimming scenes, and Arthur A. Ross who co-wrote the original Creature movie (along with Harry Essex from a story by Maurice Zimm) returns to pen the script.

The movie is notable not only for providing the Gill-Man with his most human portrayal yet, but for literally making him the most humane of the main protagonists all together.

Following his escape from Ocean Harbor at the end of the last movie, the creature is now living in the Florida Everglades. An expedition led by the emotionally unstable Dr. William Barton played by Jeff Morrow …


… attempts to (what else?) find the Gill-Man and capture him for study. Along for the ride are Dr. Thomas Morgan (the only human without serious issues in the main cast) played by Rex Reason …


… swamp guide Jed Grant played by Greg Palmer, and Barton’s withdrawn and rebellious (and much abused) wife Marcie played by Leigh Snowden.


They eventually find the Gill-Man (didn’t see that one coming, did ya?) and capture him but not before he is severely burned due to an incident with a can of gasoline.


Dr. Barton leads his fellow scientists in an emergency surgery where they discover a layer of human-like skin beneath the creature’s chard gills. He also appears to have conveniently developed lungs to breathe with. Soon the Gill-Man is more of a land walker than a sea swimmer and enters the human world.


This film, much like Revenge Of The Creature, is remarkable in that unlike so many horror franchises before it, it precedes to explore new territory instead of re-treading the same tired plot again and again. I think more than anything it’s the restless, inventive quality of this series that has helped the Gill-Man to endure so long in popular culture.

The film not only defies convention with its story, but also transcends its subject matter, using the creature as an outside observer to some of the most inhuman qualities of civilization. While still on the ship and recovering from surgery, he saves Marcie Barton from essentially being raped by Jed Grant.

He is then taken back to the laboratory of Dr. Barton (who is unaware of what Jed did but still distrusts him) and kept in a steel cage. But despite his surroundings the Gill-Man’s genuine kindness shines through. He is still capable of violence (as one scene involving a mountain lion clearly attests), but does not desire to be.
The film climaxes when Dr. Barton accuses Jed of having an affair with his wife. The two fight and Barton literally pistol whips Jed to death. Horrified at his own actions (as is the creature who has had to bear witness to all this from his cage), Barton dumps Jed’s body in the creature’s cell in attempt to frame him for the murder.


This sits none to well with the Gill-Man who bursts forth from his cage in the climax, goes on a rampage, and eventually slays Barton himself. The film ends with the Gill-Man walking back to sea.

Despite its by-the-numbers climax, manages to make several points of serious social commentary, it reinvents the Gill-Man to make him more sympathetic and less frightening, and its human characters deviate from the normal stereotypes of heroic male, best buddy sidekick, and swooning heroine to a dark, frightening glimpse of what some might term human monsters. To a point, I think it predates the formula of commentary + shock that George Romero would pioneer twelve years later with Night Of The Living Dead.

It is as much a character piece as it is a monster movie and a woefully unsung entry in the Universal Studios’ Monster Library. I’m even going to go so far as to say that I think it’s better than Revenge Of The Creature and almost as good as the original (and certainly more thoughtful).

If you’ve never seen this little gem, you are absolutely missing a spectacle you will never forget! John Sherwood didn’t direct many features, and after viewing this move I’ve come to regret that as deeply as the ocean depths themselves.

From The Archives: Revenge of the Creature: A Review and Overview of One Very Fishy Sequel




The Gill-Man returns for his second film outing and lucky for us so do William Alland and Jack Arnold! Alland wrote the story and hired veteran screenwriter Martin Berkeley to script it out.

Berkeley had written and would continue to write a number of screenplays for both film and television, but his real lasting fame (and mark of infamy) would be his reputation as the witness to name (and thus blackball) more Hollywood personalities than anyone else called before the House Un-American Activities Committee.

Actor Ben Chapman In His Later Years

Ricou Browning came back to play the Gill-Man’s swimming scenes, but Ben Chapman who had played the creature on land in the first film was no longer under contract to Universal when the sequel was put into production, so he was replaced by Tom Hennesey, a Hollywood stuntman turned actor.

                                                                          Ben Chapman in the Gill-Man Costume

Revenge of the Creature is not as good as the original, but it’s not bad as sequels go. Like any good sequel, it takes the elements worked for it previously and tries to find new things to do with them.
The story opens with Captain Lucas, (the Captain of the ship the Gill-Man attacked in the first movie whom I’ve foolishly forgotten to mention thus far) once again played by Nestor Paiva, taking a representative of the Ocean Harbor Aquarium and a professional game hunter into the Amazon to look for the Gill-Man.


They find him soon enough which is good and bad in certain respects. On one hand it’s foolish to hold off showing the creature. Everyone already knows what the Gil-Man looks like so there’s not much point in making them wait half the movie to see him again, but it’s also bad for the fact that his sudden appearance in the movie distills any kind of dread the audience might have felt while waiting for his big reveal.

Captain Lucas only has a small role at the beginning but his experience with the creature helps to bridge this film with the last.
The rest of the plot is more or less predictable. The Gill-Man is captured, taken to civilization where he’s made the object of scientific studies and an exhibit at Ocean Harbor. The story retreads even more familiar waters when the Gill-Man escapes and goes on a hunt for the lovely ichthyology student who had been observing him in his tank; Helen Dobson played by Lori Nelson.

 Lori Nelson alongside her 'Revenge' co-start John Agar
This plot is as old as the modern monster movie itself, and by that I mean as old as King Kong. In faThis plot is as old as the modern monster movie itself, and by that I mean as old as King Kong. In fact, it’s interesting how much the Gill-Man ends up echoing Kong in this second feature. Both were savage beasts that displayed the all too human emotions of love and sympathy and both of these creatures have managed to stir those same feelings in movie goers down through the years.ct, it’s interesting how much the Gill-Man ends up echoing Kong in this second feature. Both were savage beasts that displayed the all too human emotions of love and sympathy and both of these creatures have managed to stir those same feelings in movie goers down through the years.  Both monsters are captured by humans and put on display, both monsters escape and would probably stand a chance of getting away all together if not for their attraction to a beautiful young woman.
                                                                     

I’m not accusing the Gill-Man of ripping Kong off anymore than I would accuse Captain Marvel of ripping off Superman (though did you know there was a law suit in the 1940s wherein the owners of Superman sued the creators of Captain Marvel for copyright infringement). What I am pointing out is a very different take on an already established story that manages to do new things and go new places by shifting the setting a bit.

As for the climax of this delightful picture? Sorry, I’m not telling. You’ll have to watch it for yourself to see how Lori Nelson gets out of this scrape and if the Gil-Man ever decides to climb the Empire State Building.
There are a few fun facts to mention though. For instance, both The Creature From The Black Lagoon and Revenge Of The Creature were originally shot in 3-D. At the time this film was made and (so far as I know) to this day, it remains the only sequel to a 3-D movie that was also shot in 3-D.

Clint Eastwood on Set      
And there’s more! This film also boasts the very first on screen appearance of a talented young actor who would rise to become one of the most famous action stars and film directors of all time: Mr. Clint Eastwood! He has a minor uncredited role as an assistant in a science lab, but still. It's Clint freakin' Eastwood! The first movie introduced the creator of Flipper to film and the second installment gives us a nerdy version of Dirty Harry! How cool is that!

This movie is definitely worth a watch. It’s only been released to dvd as part of Universal Studios Legacy collection. The movie comes packaged with the original Creature From The Black Lagoon as well as it’s second sequel (the follow up to Revenge) The Creature Walks Among us, which we’ll talk more about in the coming days.



If you’re interesting in buying the dvd, it can be had at amazon.com for a very reasonable price.
Creature Week continues tomorrow, so stay tuned!

From The Archives: You Will Believe A Fish Can Sing

(This article was first posted on September 22, 2011 and has been altered since its' original publication)

Despite his numerous appearances in pop culture and film, the original feature The Creature From The Black Lagoon is considered by many to be the Gill-Man's finest hour.

As a study in contrasts, I thought that for day two of Creature Week we might take a look at one of his low points. Yes, it's time to talk about Creature From The Black Lagoon: The Musical!


On June 2nd of 2008, the studiotour.com (a great little website which you can view here) reported this:
With state-of-the-art stagecraft, acrobatic choreography and hilarious, toe-tapping music, the Creature will be brought to life in a story based on the original screenplay, updated to emphasize the element of romance and just a bit of comic relief. Original new music and dazzling production numbers will keep the attraction contemporary and lively.
And with those words, the great and mighty Gill-Man went through one of the silliest ordeals ever to befall a movie monster! But why you ask? Well, back in 2008 it looked like a remake of the Creature might actually get produced. Like so many previous attempts to revisit or reinvent the Gill-Man it was ultimately doomed to failure, but Universal was so sure it would come to fruition they created a musical stage play to help promote it.

The director's credit fell to Lynne Taylor-Corbett whose Broadway credits include choreography for "Titanic", "Chess", and "Swing" among others. The latter of those three, she also directed. She has also directed numerous Off Broadway productions and is a multiple Tony Award Nominee.

Gerard Alessandrini served as co-directer with Ms. Taylor-Corbett, and also acted as co-lyricist with Fred Barton who composed the music for the play.

These were not untalented people or hacks, and to be honest the production was lavish, fairly well staged and beautifully constructed. The problem was not so much in a misunderstanding of theater as it was their subject matter.

The basic premise of the play was that of a romantic comedy. The original film had been a thoughtful tragedy with a very human monster. The source material was subtle which is the opposite of a musical. Musical's work in broad strokes. Monster films have always degenerated into camp when their subtle aspects or humanity were removed.

So it was the Creature fell from grace and that's the reason why. On the plus side, while the production hardly does the Gil-Man justice, it is a hoot to watch! I might even be so bold as to say this musical does for the Gill-Man what Adam West did for Batman.

If anyone's curious, you can check out the entire play below. It's only about 30 minutes and seeing as how the production has been canceled for some time, this is the only way you're ever going to see it ... maybe that's a good thing, no?

Enjoy! ... or cringe, your choice.
 



For those interested in the theater personalities involved you can check out Lynne Taylor-Corbett's official website, you can read up on this interview with Gerard Alessandrini here or you can go to Fred Barton's official website.

But for those of you who are interested in even more Gill-Man news and trivia, stay tuned. There's more Creature Week coming up tomorrow!

From The Archives: Why Creature Week?

(originally posted on September 20, 2010)

Perhaps you're asking yourself that.

What it boils down to is how amazed I am at the amount of people who lump horror movies into a single genre, when there are so many subgenres in this field, and each one with its own merits.

There's suspense thrillers like Psycho ...





Slasher films like Halloween ...




Fantasy Horror like Phantasm ...





And of course, who could overlook monster movies.

But even among something as specific as a monster movie there's still any number of subgenres to consider. Take vampire flicks and zombie pictures for example. They are as different from each other as Westerns, such as The Big Country, are from desert epics like Lawrence of Arabia.

Incidentally I chose to mention Big Country and Lawrence to make a point. Both of these movies are set in largely desolate countries, both feature social commentary, both were serious dramas, yet if you hold them up side by side there's not one chance in a hundred that anyone would ever mistake the two as belonging to the same genre of film.

Getting back on topic, vampire thrillers often involve the occult, some type of seduction or manipulation of other people, and of course, lots and lots of sharp wooden stakes and big plastic fangs. The zombie genre on other hand has a whole different list of qualifications. They involve plagues or curses (usually) that spread to a large number of people and by the end (not always but most times) degenerate into simple survivor pictures.
Now, I'm not here to talk about westerns, desert films, or even vampire and zombie movies. I'm only using that illustrate that there are tons of subgenres in horror films and monster movies and these subgenres are usually very that’s why we’re dedicating a whole week to The Creature From The Black Lagoon.

I’m not going to pretend to be an expert on fish-men, but as near as I can tell the genesis of these beings seems to have originated with the Gill-Man (the Creature's actual name in the movie) … on film that is. There is a strong argument that H.P. Lovecraft was the father of these strange creatures in terms of fantastic fiction. Short stories like Dagon or The Shadow Over Innsmouth seem to point towards a creature very much like the Gill-Man.

Of course, there’s no accounting for legends of mermaids, sea monsters, and other superstitions. Undoubtably the idea of men from the murky deep have been with us, and yet this subgenre in particular seems to be as mysterious as the Oceanic depths themselves.

Over the coming week I’ll be providing facts and trivia about the Gill-Man and the three Universal pictures that featured him, as well highlighting his other appearances in animation, books, and even on stage. In addition to that I’ll be talking about other films in this rarely considered fish-man genre.

Well, that’s enough splashing about with expository. Time to move out of the shallow waters and into deeper matters with …